|
Gardner v. Applied
Geographics, Inc., 2004 Mass. Superior LEXIS 240
(July 2, 2004) (Van Gestel, J.). |
|
Approximately 11 hours after the new
Massachusetts Business Corporation Act (M.G.L. ch. 156D)
went into effect, Justice Alan Van Gestel held what
surely was the first motion hearing under the new Act.
Justice Van Gestel issued a written opinion the next
day.
A majority shareholder sought an order
obligating the Company to hold an annual shareholder
meeting. The Company had held three special meetings in
lieu of an annual meeting, but the minority shareholders
had collectively |
|
refused to attend in order to block a
quorum and prevent the plaintiff from imposing her will
on the Company. (The Company bylaws required a 2/3
majority to constitute a quorum.)
The Court interpreted Section 7.03 of
Chapter 156D and concluded that special meetings without
a quorum did not satisfy the Company’s obligation. The
Court ordered that the annual meeting be held on July
16, 2004, and further reduced the quorum at this meeting
to 51% of the shares issued, outstanding, and entitled
to vote.
 |